Civil War Battles Top Ten Booklist

Gettysburg

The Civil War is the most written about event in United States history. There are an extraordinary number of books covering all aspects of the war from large overviews like James McPherson’s Battle Cry Freedom, Gary Gallagher’s books on The Union War and The Confederate War, Allan Nevins 8 volume set on the conflict, and Shelby Foote’s three volume set of books on the war. Like a lot of people, I started with Shelby Foote’s books, but over the years I have drifted towards more academic works. Unsurprisingly, all kinds of different authors have written non-fiction books on the topic. Some of these authors are academic historians such as James McPherson and Gary Gallagher, more literary authors such as Winston Groom (author of fiction works such as Forest Gump and Civil War nonfiction works Shiloh, 1862 and Vicksburg, 1863) and Shelby Foote, and an extraordinary number of independent scholars. I would not be surprised to learn that there are more self-published books on the American Civil War than any other American historical topic.

Creating this list has been both very easy and extraordinarily difficult. It is easy to find great books on Civil War Battles, but it is almost impossible to pick only ten. If you are a stickler and count the books listed, you will notice that the final is little bit higher than 10. Therefore, this list is not comprehensive. That would be impossible. Additionally, it only focuses on specific battles or campaigns of the war. Even when you intentionally restrict the number of total books on the war, you are still left with thousands of book titles. There are over 1,000 books available on Amazon discussing some aspect of the battle of Gettysburg. At the very least, these books are a great place to start an exploration of the Civil War.

Read the complete list at DailyHistory.org.

Thomas Jefferson, the Founding Fathers and Christianity: Interview with Sam Haselby

755px-Thomas_Jefferson_by_Rembrandt_Peale,_1800

Recently on Twitter, a debate broke out between Annette Gordon-Reed, Sam Haselby, and John Fea on the nature of Thomas Jefferson’s religious beliefs. The debate centered on the questions of whether or not Thomas Jefferson could be described as a Christian and wanted the United States to be a Christian nation. Ultimately, the debate could not overcome the 140 character limitations of Twitter. Fortunately, Michael Hattem preserved that debate at Jefferson, Christianity, and Twitter.

Instead of recreating the debate, it made more sense to contact one of the participants, Sam Haselby, whose recent book The Origins of American Religious Nationalism(published by Oxford University Press) examines how a conflict with Protestantism, in the decades following US independence transformed American national identity. Gordon Wood described his book in the New York Review of Books as an “impressive and powerfully argued book – that ….it was American Protestantism and not any sort of classical republicanism that was most important in shaping the development of American nationalism.” The Origins of American Religious Nationalism was published in 2015 and will be republished in paperback by OUP in December 2016. It made sense to get his perspective on the concept of American Religious Nationalism, the broad issues that underpinned the recent Twitter debate, and his understanding of early American Christianity.

Sam Haselby is a visiting scholar at the Institute for Religion, Culture and Public Life at Columbia University and the editor of Aeon magazine. He recently published an article for Aeon entitled American Secular explaining why the secular movement failed soon after the founding of the United States.

Here is our interview.

Engineering Victory during the Civil War: Interview with Thomas F. Army, Jr.

Engineeringvictory copy

“The line between disorder and order lies in logistics….” -Sun Tzu

“Amateurs talk about tactics, but professionals study logistics.” – General Robert H. Barrow, USMC

Logistics win wars. Logistics is the coordination of complex operations such as moving, housing and supplying troops and their equipment. War is the ultimate test of any logistician. During the Civil War, the Union troops fought almost the entire war in the South. Thomas F. Army, Jr. argues in his new book Engineering Victory: How Technology Won the Civil War published by Johns Hopkins University Press that the Union’s engineering prowess during Civil War gave it an distinct advantage over the Confederacy. Due to a superior education system, Northern armies had individuals who could use scientific ingenuity and innovation to rapidly build and repair roads, bridges, railways. Unlike the Confederacy, the Northern armies lacked the home field advantage. Dr. Army’s delves deeply into a aspect of the Civil War that most other historians have only discussed in passing.

Read the rest of the interview at DailyHistory.org. 

Shantytown, USA: Interview with Lisa Goff

 

Shantytown

The Harvard University Press recently published Lisa Goff’s new book Shantytown, USA: Forgotten Landscapes of the Working Poor. There’s a chance that one of your American ancestors lived in an American shantytown. While we may not realize it now, shantytowns were a common feature of 19th century America. Goff’s book explores not only how shantytowns became a prominent feature of America’s towns and cities, but why middle class Americans eventually turned on them and their residents. Read more at DailyHistory.org.

Happy birthday, Jane Austen!

Johns Hopkins University Press has wished Jane Austin Happy Birthday on her 239th birthday. John Hopkins University Press authors will be curating a exhibit in 2016 dedicated to the cult of celebrity surrounding Jane Austin and William Shakespeare.

Johns Hopkins University Press Blog

Jane Austen was born on December 16, 1775, in Steventon, Hampshire, England. Today, on her 239th birthday, Austen’s life and work continue to attract enormous world-wide interest. In 2016, the Folger Shakespeare Library will host an exhibition called Will & Jane: Shakespeare, Austen, and the Cult of Celebrity, exploring how these writers became literary superheroes. The exhibition will be co-curated by JHU Press authors Janine Barchas (Matters of Fact in Jane Austen: History, Location, and Celebrity) and Kristina Straub (Domestic Affairs: Intimacy, Eroticism, and Violence between Servants and Masters in Eighteenth-Century Britain).  Congratulations, Janine and Kristina: we’ll see you at the Folger!  For now: Happy birthday, Jane!

“Will & Jane” artwork by Amanda Vela 

View original post

For T. S. Eliot’s birthday this week, a new book trailer and a look at his Complete Prose

John Hopkins University Press has posted an article about the publication of the first two digital volumes of The Complete Prose of T.S. Eliot. The guest post by Jewel Spears Brooker and Ronald Schuchard includes an brief excerpt from the introduction and video trailer for the books.

Johns Hopkins University Press Blog

Guest post by Jewel Spears Brooker and Ronald Schuchard
eliot-portrait-webDigital editions of the first two volumes of The Complete Prose of T. S. Eliot, a monumental work shepherded for many years by general editor Ronald Schuchard, will be officially published this week on Eliot’s birthday (September 26; he was born in St. Louis in 1888).  To mark the occasion, we are pleased to share a new book trailer along with a portion of the introduction to volume one, Apprentice Years, 1905–1918, which “returns readers to the beginning of Eliot’s intellectual life.”
“The token that a philosophy is true,” T. S. Eliot argued in a 1914 student essay, “is the fact that it brings us to the exact point from which we started.” Three decades later, in the final lines of his last major poem, “Four Quartets,” he echoes the idea: “And the end of all our exploring / Will…

View original post 596 more words

Celebrating the Jewish New Year with Jewish Books

The Temple University Press has posted an article celebrating the Jewish New Year with discussions of seven Jewish Studies books. These book explore a range of topics (the Catskills, sports, Jewish life and business.)

North Philly Notes

This week in North Philly Notes, we showcase seven Jewish Studies titles in honor of the Jewish New Year,  5775.

Two classic Temple University Press titles highlight the Catskills resorts, which shaped American Jewish culture and attracted over a million visitors between the 1920s and the 1950s.

Catskill Culture by Phil Brown

catskill culture clBrown tells the stories of the many elements of this magical environment. Brown’s own experiences as a waiter, his mother’s culinary exploits as a chef, and his father’s jobs as maitre d’ and coffee shop operator offer a backdrop to the vital life of Catskills summers. Catskill Culture recounts the life of guests, staff, resort owners, entertainers, and local residents through the author’s memories and archival research and the memories of 120 others.

The Catskills enabled Jews to become more American while at the same time introducing the American public to immigrant Jewish culture. Catskills entertainment provided the…

View original post 1,276 more words

A “Glimmer” of Insight from Marly Youmans

Marly Youmans has a brief article discussing her writing and her new book Glimmerglass. Check out her post at the Mercer University Press Blog.

Mercer University Press News

Ariadne’s Thread

In her working years, my mother was a university librarian, but now she has retired to a world of garden, birds, books, and weaving. If I glance at her loom, I find that some things are always plain and simple: warp, weft, shuttle, ‘shed,’ reed, and beater. But as time passes, what is wound on the cloth beam changes. When she removes the cloth, I may find shawls and table runners and the most absurdly beautiful hand towels—it’s all a surprise. Patterns may vary wildly; there are infinite variations. The constants are tension, materials, and one person’s distinct sense of color and design.

It’s that way in many of the arts. The self (however much in flux it might be) and the tools are the constant warp, and the weft of art dances its dance among the threads.

Sometimes I am asked why I write in what people…

View original post 386 more words

Lincoln’s Biggest Bet: Interview with Todd Brewster

Todd Brewster
Todd Brewster

Todd Brewster has had a remarkable career in both journalism and academia.  He worked with both Life magazine and ABC News as a Senior Editor and Producer.  When he was with ABC News he teamed with Peter Jennings on two monumental projects, The Century and In Search of America.  The Century and In Search of America were mini-series that aired on the History Channel and ABC.  In conjunction with the mini-series Todd Brewster and Peter Jennings wrote two bestselling books, The Century  and In Search of America.   In 2008, Brewster became the Don E. Ackerman Director of Oral History at the United States Military Academy.  Brewster established a video archive of including veterans from World War II up to our most recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.  In addition to his responsibilities at West Point, Brewster is the Director of The Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution.  The Project brings in 40 Jennings Fellows each year to study the Constitution in depth.  The Project is committed to helping journalists understand how the Constitution reaches into every American’s life.

On September 9, Scribner will publish Brewster’s new book entitled Lincoln’s Gamble:  The Tumultuous Six Months that Gave America the Emancipation Proclamation and Changed the Course of the Civil War.  Brewster’s book explores the six months when Lincoln struggled with the war, his cabinet, and how best to free the slaves.

Todd Brewster’s book Lincoln’s Gamble is available for pre-order at Powell’sAmazon, and Barnes and Noble. To learn more about Todd’s book visit www.lincolnsgamble.com.

Here’s our interview:

What drew you to write about Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation?  

The Emancipation Proclamation is one of the three most important documents in American history, and yet it is by far the least known. It has more in common with the Declaration than the Constitution (the other two). Like the Declaration, it was an act of war and like the Declaration it addressed the American value of equality. Yet unlike either of those documents, the EP was really the work of one man, Abraham Lincoln. How is it, I wondered, that we do not know more about this document, about its origin and development and the history of its authorship? And why is it so different from anything else that Lincoln ever wrote? No stirring phrases, no poetry here, only dense legalese. How do we make sense of it with everything else we know about him?

So all of that made me interested in studying the document and its history more deeply. Then I found that the six months between July 1862 and January 1863 served as a neatly contained episode of Lincoln’s life in that they framed the time when he first mentioned the Proclamation and the date when he actually signed the document. More than that, those six months were some of the most turbulent for Lincoln, the nation, and the war. When the book begins, he is still mourning the death of his son, Willie, who succumbed to typhoid in February and in fact the opening scene is a carriage ride to the funeral of another child – this, the infant son of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton – who also died of typhoid. The climactic battle of Antietam falls in September of this year, the mid-term elections in November and Lincoln’s muddled address to the nation in December. Through all of this time, he is undergoing a spiritual, emotional and political crisis. What drama!

Emancipation Proclamation
The Emancipation Proclamation

Are there any themes or ideas from The Century and In Search of America that you see in Lincoln’s Gamble?  Both The Century and In Search of America were trying to decode America, does Lincoln’s Gamble also try to do this?     

The “decoding of America” is a preoccupation of mine and, yes, as with “The Century” and “In Search…” there is a lot in “Lincoln’s Gamble” that addresses the ever-evolving nature of the American identity. For instance, I believe that the Emancipation Proclamation was a turning point toward a bi-racial and ultimately a multi-racial America. We take this for granted now, but pre Civil War America was largely white and Anglo-Saxon.

I do not know this for sure, but I would not be surprised if the wave of immigration that came in the end of the 19th century was driven in part by a feeling that began with the Emancipation Proclamation in that it emphasized the universality of freedom expressed in the American idea.

It was also a turning point for the notion of freedom as expressed in the American story. As long as the country sanctioned slavery, there was an inherent contradiction to the American idea. Lincoln understood this. He just didn’t know what path to follow out of the predicament that the Constitutional Convention, sanctioning slavery, had given us. What is at issue in the Civil War? A lot. It is not just the institution of slavery; it is the whole progressive notion that wherever you start in life you can come out better than you began. Lincoln’s own life had been an example of this freedom – he was a poor barefoot child of Kentucky who rose to become president of the United States. Slavery was an abomination not because it treated blacks as subservient from whites (racial equality is not a particularly prominent interest of Lincoln’s) but because slavery sprang from the same tyrannical spirit that monarchs claimed as their birthright: the power to live off the labor of others, to say, “You work and toil and earn bread, and I’ll eat it.”

Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln

You justifiably describe the Emancipation Proclamation as Lincoln’s Gamble.  How did Lincoln and his cabinet believe people would react to the Emancipation Proclamation?  What were their worst fears?

Lincoln had a great many worries as to how the Emancipation Proclamation would be received. His cabinet did as well, though they were not always in agreement with him as to which worries were the ones they should most be worrying about. Lincoln was concerned about the reactions of the Border States; that emancipation might drive them to join the rebels.

There were also worries that the Emancipation Proclamation would not be popular in the North. Early on in the war, many young men were prepared to join the fight for Union and did, but once Lincoln had declared emancipation it would be hard to argue that the war was not about ending slavery and it was unclear if Northern boys were prepared risk their lives for that mission. There were also concerns in the North that if the slaves were freed they would come up the river and take the hard labor jobs from white workers. But by far the greatest fear was that that they would not come North at all but turn on their former masters in a massive bloodbath spurred by their longstanding wish for revenge. In the final version of the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln included language encouraging the freed slaves “to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defence.”

Aside from the Emancipation Proclamation what do you think were Lincoln’s credible alternatives?  Did he try to develop any alternatives?

That is a very good question. Let’s not forget that up until the Emancipation Proclamation, the war being fought ostensibly to restore the conditions of the pre-war Union, which is to say, the nation with slavery intact. At any point, the South could have surrendered and retained its slave system. When the South did not surrender, the Proclamation was then issued in two stages – the preliminary Proclamation and the final Proclamation.  The Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation was essentially a threat to the South: agree to rejoin the Union and adopt a plan for an immediate or gradual end to slavery in the next ninety days or the president will issue the order freeing their slaves and the invading Union army will enforce that. The second and final Proclamation put the policy into effect.

But what would have happened if Lincoln had issued no Emancipation Proclamation? For one, he might have lost the war. Soldiers in the North were already growing weary of the fighting and unlike the South they were not defending their homeland so they did not have the same passion for the fight as the rebel soldiers did. The Emancipation Proclamation not only provided a new mission to the battle; it also unleashed the force of thousands of new soldiers – the freed slaves – who provided renewed vigor to the fight. Finally, what would have happened if Lincoln had issued the EP not in 1863 but in 1861 when the war began? Many people believe that the country was not ready for such a radical policy and that Lincoln would have looked ruthless in his approach to the South. In fact, Lincoln still hoped that he could retain the Southern states and establish a plan for a gradual, negotiated end to slavery. Here is an incredible thought to behold: Lincoln, in his famous debates with Stephen Douglas, argued that the peaceful and gradual end to slavery might take a hundred years or more, meaning that slavery would have remained a part of American life to 1958! Of course the long-term alternative to freeing the slaves was to return them to Africa. This remained an interest of Lincoln’s well after the Proclamation was signed.

Abraham_Lincoln_seated,_Feb_9,_1864

Even though Lincoln is perhaps the most carefully documented and discussed president in United States history, he has remained surprisingly enigmatic.  How does your book help us understand this complicated man?

I believe my portrayal of Lincoln shows him as more human, more flawed, than most biographers are willing to acknowledge. The introduction describes the inspiration for this picture of Lincoln as coming from a passage in an essay by W.E.B. DuBois, the African-American intellectual whose work with the N.A.A.C.P. in the early part of the twentieth century was a force leading to the Civil Rights movement. In that essay, DuBois derides Lincoln as poor, uneducated, awkward and as “a politician down to his toes.” But he then goes on to say that he loves Lincoln not because he was perfect but because “he was not and yet triumphed.” Lincoln did not believe in equality, he was pessimistic about the races ever living together in harmony, he was far too trusting of his generals early in the war and he wielded power in ways that went well beyond Constitution. He was a master of indecision, projecting out the consequences of each choice and doing so, often, in front of others so that it was unclear where he really stood. In these six months, he goes through a spiritual and emotional crisis that leads him to greater and greater doubt.  He was not some “giant among men,” as so many have portrayed him. He was a man.

When you were writing and researching this story, what surprised you most?  

I think I was most surprised by the intensity of the debate over equality. Like many, I had always thought that those who wanted an end to slavery believed in the equality of the races. But this is far from true. Slavery was an issue unto itself. Then, even on slavery, it surprised me to learn that as late as 1860 the abolitionists were so far from the mainstream of American thought. They were looked upon as religious fanatics and many – even some who were not abolitionists but who believed slavery should eventually end – felt that the abolitionists were the reason for this war, not the Southern slaveholders. That all changes very rapidly. There is a delicious moment after the issuing of the Preliminary Proclamation in September, 1862, when Secretary of the Treasury Salmon Chase and John Hay, who was Lincoln’s personal secretary, retire along with a few other administration officials to Chase’s home to sip wine and celebrate the moment. Hay later wrote of this scene that they “gleefully and merrily called each other abolitionists and seemed to enjoy appropriating that horrible name.”

You co-authored your two previous books with Peter Jennings.  I can imagine that having a writing partner could both be extremely rewarding and potentially frustrating.  How did writing Lincoln’s Gamble differ from writing those two earlier books with Peter Jennings?  

Peter and I had a great collaboration method. “The Century” was not only a book. It was also a television series. Same with “In Search of America.”  We worked together on the overall concept for each project, but Peter and his Executive Producer, Tom Yellin, took the lead on the television while I took the lead on writing the books. I think that is the only way a collaboration can work. There has to be a senior partner and a junior partner and each medium has to work to its own strengths. By comparison, Lincoln’s Gamble was naturally, then, a more private project. It was both lonelier and more personal. There is a lot of me in “The Century” and “In Search…” but even more in “Lincoln’s Gamble.” That said, I have to add that Peter was a great partner and a great journalist. I miss him greatly.

Lincoln Memorial
Lincoln Memorial


How would you use Lincoln’s Gamble in a class?  How will your book help students better understand Lincoln or the Civil War?

Well, to begin, it is a great study of the last six months of 1862, a period which forms a hinge moment for the war. The summer of 1862 is a point of failure for the Union; Antietam, in September, is a qualified Union victory (even though McClellan lets Lee get away); Fredericksburg, in December, is another disastrous defeat for the North. But with the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation, the tide begins to turn. The shift comes from Lincoln’s decision to fight a more aggressive war. The Proclamation is part of this more aggressive war, of course, and upon its signing Southern leaders accuse Lincoln of abandoning the rules of “civilized warfare” by undermining civil society.

Lincoln’s decision to move away from the cautious battlefield plans of George McClellan – the arrogant, West Point trained general whom Lincoln fires in October, 1862 – takes this approach even further. West Point officers like McClellan had been trained according to the ideas of the Swiss military theorist Antoine-Henri Jomini who believed there was a science to war that, carefully followed, would limit the bloodshed and maximize the results. Yet in fact, Jomini’s theories had little application to the conditions of the American Civil War. After firing McClellan, Lincoln eventually moves toward what we today would call the Clausewitz approach to battle that was exhibited by Grant and Sherman: maximum force to achieve quick, decisive victories. This turning point is sometimes seen not only as a shift in the Civil War, but as a shift in the history of warfare itself, prefiguring the total war of the twentieth century.

So, I think you could use this as a study of the war.   I would use Lincoln’s Gamble as a method of addressing how some of the greatest acts of human history are not obvious, inevitable or easy. They may look easy in retrospect but that is only because we examine them out of context or because we tend to be so protective of our heroes, of our “great man” vision of how history has unfolded.

Check out the DailyHistory.org Bookshelf which includes all of our favorite books from Powell’s Bookstore.